Vice President Professor Jane Naana Opoku-Agyemang has described a new United Nations resolution recognizing the transatlantic slave trade as a “grave crime against humanity” as a monumental step in addressing historical injustice.
The Vice President made these remarks on Sunday while joining Chief of Staff Julius Debrah, government officials, and traditional leaders to welcome President John Dramani Mahama back to Ghana following the historic vote at the UN. The resolution, introduced by Ghana, passed with 123 votes in favor. It officially labels the enslavement of approximately 12 million Africans and their descendants as a grave human rights violation, a move seen as a precursor to formal apologies, the return of cultural artifacts, and reparations.
“It was an honour to join Ghanaians in welcoming you back home following your leadership in securing the historic United Nations resolution recognising the transatlantic slave trade as the gravest crime against humanity,” Professor Opoku-Agyemang said. “This is a consequential moment. It confronts a long-standing injustice and affirms the importance of acknowledging difficult historical periods. It is a recognition of the past, a moral statement, and a challenge to preserve and present this history with accuracy and seriousness.”
She added, “Ghana has spoken with principle, engaging the history of the African continent and the wider diaspora. This is a proud moment for Ghana and Africa, and a significant one for people of African descent.”
President Mahama, who serves as the African Union’s Champion for Reparations, received a rousing welcome upon his arrival on March 29. He noted that the achievement demonstrates what unity and purpose can accomplish, asserting that Ghana has once again provided moral leadership on the global stage.
“This is a proud moment for Ghana. It is a proud moment for Africa. It is a proud moment for people of African descent wherever they are in the world,” President Mahama stated. “This is not just about the past. It is about justice, dignity, and truth.”
While the resolution received broad support, three countries, including the United States, voted against it. The U.S. cited concerns regarding the specific language used in the document and potential legal implications.