The World Health Organization has stood by its handling of the COVID-19 pandemic after the United States announced its departure from the global health body.
The US withdrawal cited various concerns about WHO’s pandemic performance, including allegations that the organization hindered the prompt and accurate dissemination of vital information and subsequently covered up these shortcomings.
In its response, WHO acknowledged that neither any organization nor government handled every aspect of the crisis perfectly, but maintained that its actions during the unprecedented health emergency were appropriate.
The organization stated it moved swiftly throughout the pandemic, disseminated available information openly and without delay to the global community, and provided guidance to member nations based on the strongest available scientific evidence.
“WHO recommended the use of masks, vaccines and physical distancing, but at no stage recommended mask mandates, vaccine mandates or lockdowns. We supported sovereign governments to make decisions they believed were in the best interests of their people, but the decisions were theirs,” the statement read.
According to WHO’s account, upon receiving initial reports of a “pneumonia of unknown cause” cluster in Wuhan, China, on December 31, 2019, the organization immediately requested additional details from China and activated its emergency response protocols. Before China reported its first fatality on January 11, 2020, WHO had already notified the international community through official channels, public announcements, and social media platforms, assembled international experts, and distributed extensive guidelines to help countries safeguard their populations and healthcare infrastructure.
WHO expressed disappointment over America’s decision to withdraw, describing it as making both the nation and the world less secure. The organization noted that as a founding member, the United States has played a significant role in numerous WHO accomplishments, including smallpox eradication and advances against various other public health challenges such as polio, HIV, Ebola, influenza, tuberculosis, malaria, neglected tropical diseases, antimicrobial resistance, and food safety issues.
The withdrawal notification will be examined by the WHO Executive Board during its scheduled meeting beginning February 2 and by the World Health Assembly at its annual gathering in May 2026.
WHO also addressed US statements claiming the organization had insulted America and compromised its independence, asserting the opposite was true and that it has consistently engaged with the United States respectfully and in good faith while honoring American sovereignty.
The organization rejected claims that it has followed a politicized, bureaucratic approach influenced by nations antagonistic to American interests, stating that as a UN specialized agency governed by 194 member states, WHO has always been and continues to be neutral, serving all nations equally and respectfully without bias.
WHO indicated it hopes the United States will eventually resume active involvement in the organization while reaffirming its unwavering dedication to collaborating with all nations in pursuit of its fundamental mission and constitutional objective: achieving the highest possible standard of health as a basic human right for all people.
Below is the full statement…
WHO statement on notification of withdrawal of the United States
24 January 2026– As a founding member of the World Health Organization (WHO), the United States of America has contributed significantly to many of WHO’s greatest achievements, including the eradication of smallpox, and progress against many other public health threats including polio, HIV, Ebola, influenza, tuberculosis, malaria, neglected tropical diseases, antimicrobial resistance, food safety and more.
WHO therefore regrets the United States’ notification of withdrawal from WHO – a decision that makes both the United States and the world less safe. The notification of withdrawal raises issues that will be considered by the WHO Executive Board at its regular meeting starting on 2 February and by the World Health Assembly at its annual meeting in May 2026.
WHO takes note of statements from the government of the United States that say WHO has “trashed and tarnished” and insulted it, and compromised its independence. The reverse is true. As we do with every Member State, WHO has always sought to engage with the United States in good faith, with full respect for its sovereignty.
In its statements, the United States cited as one of the reasons for its decision, “WHO failures during the COVID-19 pandemic”, including “obstructing the timely and accurate sharing of critical information” and that WHO “concealed those failures”. While no organization or government got everything right, WHO stands by its response to this unprecedented global health crisis. Throughout the pandemic, WHO acted quickly, shared all information it had rapidly and transparently with the world, and advised Member States on the basis of the best available evidence. WHO recommended the use of masks, vaccines and physical distancing, but at no stage recommended mask mandates, vaccine mandates or lockdowns. We supported sovereign governments to make decisions they believed were in the best interests of their people, but the decisions were theirs.
Immediately after receiving the first reports of a cluster of cases of “pneumonia of unknown cause” in Wuhan, China on 31 December 2019, WHO asked China for more information and activated its emergency incident management system. By the time the first death was reported from China on 11 January 2020, WHO had already alerted the world through formal channels, public statements and social media, convened global experts, and published comprehensive guidance for countries on how to protect their populations and health systems. When the WHO Director-General declared COVID-19 a public health emergency of international concern under the International Health Regulations on 30 January 2020 – the highest level of alarm under international health law – outside of China there were fewer than 100 reported cases, and no reported deaths.
In the first weeks and months of the pandemic, the Director-General urged all countries repeatedly to take immediate action to protect their populations, warning that “the window of opportunity is closing”, “this is not a drill” and describing COVID-19 as “public enemy number one”.
In response to the multiple reviews of the COVID-19 pandemic, including of WHO’s performance, WHO has taken steps to strengthen its own work, and to support countries to bolster their own pandemic preparedness and response capacities. The systems we developed and managed before, during and after the emergency phase of the pandemic, and which run 24/7, have contributed to keeping all countries safe, including the United States.
The United States also said in its statements that WHO has “pursued a politicized, bureaucratic agenda driven by nations hostile to American interests”. This is untrue. As a specialized agency of the United Nations, governed by 194 Member States, WHO has always been and remains impartial and exists to serve all countries, with respect for their sovereignty, and without fear or favour.
WHO appreciates the support and continued engagement of all its Member States, which continue to work within the framework of WHO to pursue solutions to the world’s biggest health threats, both communicable and noncommunicable. Most notably, WHO Member States last year adopted the WHO Pandemic Agreement, which once ratified will become a landmark instrument of international law to keep the world safer from future pandemics. Member States are now negotiating an annex to the WHO Pandemic Agreement, the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing system, which if adopted will promote rapid detection and sharing of pathogens with pandemic potential, and equitable and timely access to vaccines, therapeutics and diagnostics.
We hope that in the future, the United States will return to active participation in WHO. Meanwhile, WHO remains steadfastly committed to working with all countries in pursuit of its core mission and constitutional mandate: the highest attainable standard of health as a fundamental right for all people.