The International Federation of Women Lawyers (FIDA Ghana) has petitioned the Judicial Service of Ghana over what it describes as inappropriate and gender-biased language used in a recent divorce ruling.
In a letter dated April 13 to Acting Chief Justice Paul Baffoe-Bonnie, the group raised concerns about a judgment delivered on January 20, 2026, by Justice Justin Dorgu in a case involving Joana Quaye and Richard Nii Armah Quaye.
FIDA criticised the judge’s description of the petitioner as “physically attractive” and “capable of remarrying anytime,” arguing that such remarks are irrelevant to legal analysis and undermine the dignity of women in court proceedings.
The organisation stressed that while it respects judicial independence, the language used in rulings must remain objective, measured, and free from stereotypes. It warned that such commentary risks eroding public confidence in the fairness and neutrality of the courts.
FIDA also took issue with other aspects of the ruling, including characterisations of the petitioner’s financial claims as “ridiculous” and suggestions that financial relief could deter divorce. The group argued that courts are not meant to discourage individuals from seeking lawful remedies when marriages break down.
Citing Ghana’s constitutional provisions on marital property, the organisation emphasised the need for equitable consideration of both direct and indirect contributions, including domestic and emotional labour.
FIDA further warned that judicial language has broader societal implications, shaping public perception and potentially discouraging women from seeking justice. It is urging the Judicial Service to take corrective steps, including enhanced judicial training, to promote gender-sensitive adjudication and uphold fairness, dignity, and equality in the courts.